The Ruckers Forum

Forum » Rugby » General Stuff » Why Victor is no legend
Login to reply
 
 
 
7187 Topic: Why Victor is no legend
mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8381
Why Victor is no legend
November 13, 2013, 15:34:01

He only won 63% of his games.


The_Truth

Status: Baby Bok
Posts: 169
RE: Why Victor is no legend
November 13, 2013, 15:52:26
 Which is close to the average win ratio for South Africa throughout history (62%).

But that is what it's like when someone uses the worst argument in the history of mankind to try and slag off one player...

Eh, you can also add Butch James, a world cup winner at 54%


clevermike

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 12592
RE: Why Victor is no legend
November 13, 2013, 16:00:24
:D:D:D 


CleanCut

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1824
RE: Why Victor is no legend
November 13, 2013, 16:17:41
 

Haaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahaaaa!!!

Too funny!!!!!!


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8381
RE: Why Victor is no legend
November 13, 2013, 17:10:04
I think we can safely deep six that argument. 


Sun-Tzu

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 713
RE: Why Victor is no legend
November 14, 2013, 13:03:59
Wait Mozart, there is yet more to learn... Wayne Julies has a 90% record! So he is better than every other Boks in Meyer's team! Even Basson, with 81%, makes Victor look rather ordinary.


Leave a reply:

You need to be logged in to leave a reply.
 
 

From The Sideline