The Ruckers Forum

Forum » Rugby » General Stuff » Mike for the record
Login to reply
 
 
 
3710 Topic: Mike for the record
Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
Mike for the record
February 12, 2013, 18:22:01

Did I ever post a picture of my home on the old sites we used to all be on. I know you dont want to get involved in this shit, so a simple yes or no will do

 

Thanks bud


clevermike

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11984
RE: Mike for the record
February 12, 2013, 18:24:23

No - and frankly I am not interested.  


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
RE: Mike for the record
February 12, 2013, 18:25:31

Thanks bud that is all I needed to hear


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 7867
RE: Mike for the record
February 12, 2013, 18:29:24

Mike where were you posting between 2007 and 2011? And how much. It seems to me you were gone most of those years.


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
RE: Mike for the record
February 12, 2013, 18:34:50

Poor old Moffie getting desperate bwhaaahaaaa

 

I dont actually recall the year Moffie disgraced himself with that picture of his house, Becs or Jal will know - but it was in the days Mike was about, that is for sure


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 7867
RE: Mike for the record
February 12, 2013, 18:39:07

You don't recall the "hear" hahahaha. But I do recall that Mike hasn't posted with us for years. How can he possibly opine. Your witness strategy is a joke. My memory is much more reliable.


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
RE: Mike for the record
February 12, 2013, 18:44:42

Yeah Mike has not posted for a few years but your disgraceful episode took place way before that. That messageboard closed down but your disgusting boastful postings of your home and cars is a vivid memory - it was sick

 

How you feeling liar, those walls must be close

 

 


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 7867
RE: Mike for the record
February 12, 2013, 18:53:09

But your episode didn't occur when Mike was there you fool. The two incidents were totally unrelated...your cottage years after my postings. By the way I see your size and your house have become a joke on SS as well. Some quite funny stuff.

 

Seems you are now well "positioned" on two sites as a fat, short plonker. Which is as it should be.


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
RE: Mike for the record
February 12, 2013, 19:31:44

Oh how convenient Moffie, so I happened to post a picture of my property years after you did the same

 

Man you really are scraping the barrel you pathetic low life liar

 

How stupid are you feeling now, Mike has just sunk you.

 

Moffie the other site contains a bunch of good lads and ladies where humour is above board - you are being highlighted for the twat you are. I guess you have read that Duke has you as lying about me posting a pic of my home on the net and hell I never even prompted him - let me guess he was not around then either

 

Sink old fart, shout when you need that spade or paddle......bwahaaahaaa......i love it. Exposed and flat on the floor


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 7867
RE: Mike for the record
February 12, 2013, 20:14:07

Yep in that very posting Duke opined that the door was probably 5x5 feet. I think they have you pegged there de Flatus.


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
RE: Mike for the record
February 12, 2013, 20:18:21

Moffie what Duke said, was that you were lying about me posting a pic of my home.......the door reference was a joke at your expense - they all know how pathetic you are banging on about me being short and fat all the time.

 

They saw you for who you are and banished you for being the pathetic lying wanker that you are.

 

I have served to confirm that on this site - spade or paddle old boy?


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 7867
RE: Mike for the record
February 12, 2013, 20:55:26

Another lie....I was never banished, I left. After which, in a fit of petulance they banned me. A fatal mistake because it led directly to this site's recovery.


becs

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 604
RE: Mike for the record
February 12, 2013, 21:04:17

Oh all hail Mozart !

I'm sure the owners of this site are so grateful to you !!!!  And your breathtaking arrogance in stating such a fact, let alone believing it to be true !!


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
RE: Mike for the record
February 12, 2013, 21:08:12

So you weren't banned then and we are to take your word for it.......bwhaaaahaaaa


Jalapeno!

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 602
RE: Mike for the record
February 12, 2013, 21:13:39

Seriously, can you believe such pompous arrogance? So it was a "fatal mistake" when the Supersupporter Mods finally had enough of this spiteful, childish and vindictive old windbag and banned him . . . because he single-handedly resurrected this site?

 

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahaha!

 

You couldn't actually make this up!


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 7867
RE: Mike for the record
February 12, 2013, 21:29:16

No need to make it up. It's true, before that spat this messageboard was getting at best a post a day. Denny gets most of the credit.

 


Jalapeno!

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 602
RE: Mike for the record
February 12, 2013, 22:42:29

That doesn't make a lot of sense, Moffie. How can what I said be true and yet at the same time you give Dense most of the credit?

 

Are you just pretending to sound this stupid or do you honestly not know what the term "single-handedly" means?

 

Maybe you should go and have your afternoon nap . . . you're getting pwned every time you open your stupid trap today!

 

ROTFLMAO!


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
RE: Mike for the record
February 12, 2013, 23:03:11

And to think that this sad excuse for a man had the audacity to start a thread titled the anatomy of a braggart.

 

Fatal mistake for the SS site and single handedly resurrected this site - wow that's two birds with one Moffie - what an arrogant twat

 

And Moffie, before we lose track, for the record can you just confirm whether you are calling Mike a liar or not? Telling us he was not around at the time is a pathetic shallow excuse and does not wash.


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 7867
RE: Mike for the record
February 12, 2013, 23:17:39

Dear, dear we are grasping at straws. Look at the context RooiAAS.

 

I say..."no need to make it up. It's true". Make what up? Presumably the only thing that I supposedly made up....ie  ..."a fatal mistake because that led directly to this site's recovery".

 

So having said that, how is that inconsistent with denny getting most of the credit. Obviously it isn't,  because while a few of us came over here, and provided some momentum,  denny set about bringing in members.

 

So what's your point again?


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11071
RE: Mike for the record
February 13, 2013, 10:37:48

Firstly, Bobbok has said he was not joking about snapster putting a picture of his house on the website. One has to accept that until he says it is not so.

Next, after years of goading and being called a liar again and again Moz furnished  details. I dont recall seeing them but Moz being the honest guy he is doesnt deny it. But why should he. ou rooitwit and sharkie were begging to be put right. And they were and rooitwit disappeared in a mountain of egg. Sharkie apologised sincerely for his nonsense and rooitwit went into denial and couldnt rise to the occassion. Calling a person an outright liar again and again and challenging him tp prove it and than having him prove is a recipe for disaster. This is what happed in those days and ou rooitwit cant get over it. He was gutted when his house of cards came tumbling down. Now all one can hope for is ou rooitwit facing up to his smistakes and getting over it.

As to this site's recovery - when we arrived here there was nobody posting. After  while we had some old hands drift back. I recall Chippo being amongst the first. But very shorlty after our arrival the site was hacked and brought down. ss board and hawker protested their innocence. I felt it an extraordinary coincidence and said that although there was no evidence proving their culpability they remained suspects. We will never know who did it.

Then with the board growing we had anumber of ss moles intent on coming here to destroy the board. They failed dismally and left with their tails between their legs. Rucking flanker, Terra Nova, oneeb, bedpan posing as barca boy and a number of others. Denny came under vicious attack like I have never seen before. But to their dismay the board continued to grow!

As to what happened re Moz - he left the ss board due to biased moderation (and as he said has never looked back). I know this because I tried to sort out the matter with hawker to get Moz back. Latter Moz was banned. I was also banned and had ss moles telling me I was a liar and that I had left of my own accord. However I copied the site banning message and shut the lieing yappers up. (Recently we had that quarter wit taipansy saying Moz had left ss board on his own accord, then saying Moz had been kicked off the board and then he had lef because he was gettiing his but kickd by some total mongs on ss board - what an ass taipansy made of himself!!  He also noted their top thread was dated Nov 2010! Hahahhahahahaha it was very funny!!)

Snapster if you like the ss board so much how come you spend 90% of your time here. 

I do recall ou rooitwit left ss board in a huff as he couldn't take the overbearing moderation and his posts being moved all over the show. How about  Capone or Clean Cut what is his story. Were you also banned or what Capone?

The simple facts are that ss board started with a very big user base of ex Superport bloggers who migrated in mass to ss board when Supersport closed the rugby forum down. Where are all those guys now. It should be a huge board by now but only has a handful of active posters?  What happened? Poor moderation is the only reason. The first blunder was to have three bulle moderators - two of which were poor in handling people. They were happy to join in the banter and insult posters but cried like babies if they got it back. Then there was the sheer dishonesty of which there were more than one incident. There was the attitude that this was a private house and you did as the owner said. There was a rigid regimentation that stiffled things. Favouritism etc.

Hopefully as they grow up they will improve and realise that its a privilige to have posters and that its not all about it being such a privilege to post there. Integrity will be key - can they reform in their dealings with folk. I blundered by giving them my email address -  it contained my name and place of work. Some private details were then placed on the ss website and Keo.  Shocking really.

So what can we conclude. There is no doubt this board receved  a fillip from those of us who came here from ss board. Denny recruited a number of guys, old hands returned and the board has gone from strength to strength. It has its own momentum now  thanks to all who post here.

As for snapster he is as rude to folk on ss board as he is here. Recently he has been trying to get the use of Afrikaans banned on ss board - boy can this oak win friends and influence people!  However, he does get a few plaudits on ss board by going on about his weight and height and property, how foolish Moz is and Beeno of course as well. Plays to a small band of disgruntled oaks bored to death!

Snapster likes a lot of attention - I fear his mummy never loved him enough! Bwahahahhahahahahaha

So please be kind to snapster and to the shattered rooitwt! Hahahhahahahaha we love them both and wish both a speedy transition (Not recovery) to normality!


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
RE: Mike for the record
February 13, 2013, 11:12:11

Beenkop, I was never really sure whether you were a liar or not as I hardly pay attention to the pathetic shit you post, but your above post confirms you are a liar

 

Bobbok never said I posted a pic of my home on a site, he said he recalled a bungalow being posted by someone as a joke - get it you thick plank

 

But here is the crux, I have NEVER asked for Afrikaans to be banned on the SS site, I only requested that people not use Afrikaans as it is exclusive, you pathetic liar

 

For the record, why the hell do you spend time surfing a site where people cant stand you, take the piss out of you (for good reason) and a site you have been banned from - how pathetic are you - you go read but can't post - must really eat at you, you pathetic waste of space


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11071
RE: Mike for the record
February 13, 2013, 14:58:51

Hey snapster excuse me but I am fortunately not a lawyer. Not wanting folk to use Afrikaans on the site and it being banned are semantics you rintentios nare that it not be used.  Ou snapster will not be the prom king for sure!!  Anyone have a spare "how to win friends and influence people" to give to snapster?

I do not actually spend much time there but its a good laugh (not all there are antogonistic to me as you well know) - especially when you are taking stick. Hahahahaahhahahaha - sorry to embarrass you by all these revelations but you do deserve it. I mean slagging us off there and playing to the gallery like you do. Earnestly discussing your weight and height and lavish properties after exhausting the subject here. This is slapstick comedy snapster!   ROTFL

Now dont burst into tears ala bedpan and dorkie. You like a bit of argie bargie you said. 

 


bluebok

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1149
RE: Mike for the record
February 13, 2013, 15:23:26

Just a little side note, but has anyone else noticed that becs never comments on anything rugby related? "She" suddenly pops up on the board during these spats between Moz and Saff, just in time to back Saff up, and then just as suddenly as "she" arrives, "she" dissapears? I smell a rat.

 

It reminds me of the days whe Castle had a competition on this site where they gave away money to the top 3 posts each week (or was it each day? Doesn't matter really), as voted for by other posters. For the first little while it was awesome because people really started putting effort into their posts, then suddenly there were all these ficticious "posters" voting, that had never before and never since, posted anything on the site. As a result, stupid posts which were pointless and had no substance, started winning "all" the votes.

 

My point, I think Saff is becs.... therefore we can add being sexually confused, to his being short and fat!


Jalapeno!

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 602
RE: Mike for the record
February 13, 2013, 15:35:05

Nonsense, Becs has had plenty to add to the Six Nations threads over the last few weeks . . . which is more than some can say. Some of the rugby noobs on this board think that a long whine about what they term the 6N "boreathon" constitutes a rugby discussion.

 

Just out of interest, bluebok, if you have a problem with non-rugby threads, have you ever said something in response to one of Moffie's endless posts where he obsesses about Dave . . . or one of Baboon-ou's tearful rants where he bleats about his banning from other sites?


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11071
RE: Mike for the record
February 13, 2013, 15:42:00

Good point Bluebok. It is very strange how she always pops up at a time convenient to snapster when his poor red rump is being kicked.  As one digs a little things become stranger and stranger!!

Ou rooinek is pretty much the same though - not much about rugby from him unless its fantasy rugby!

 

 


bluebok

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1149
RE: Mike for the record
February 13, 2013, 15:50:21

Jala, I actually have had a go at Moz and all the other stars of the cast of Days Of Our Ruckers Forum. If I have seemed biased towards Moz, then he must have said something I found funny or whatever on the day I posted something, and felt he deserved a biscuit for his effort. I find these threads pointless. I have no loyalty to any poster here, I comment on what I see in a given thread, regardless of who says what. Moz IS obsessed with Saf, and visa versa. I am kinda hoping this is all just tongue in cheek stuff to pass the time until the Super Rugby season kicks off. Then we can get over these old regurgitated arguments, and talk rugga.

 

As for Becs and the six nations etc....you may be right, I unfortunately can't log on here everyday, so she may have posted something rugby related at a time where I missed a few threads....but I doubt it. The threads I read, paint a different picture.


Jalapeno!

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 602
RE: Mike for the record
February 13, 2013, 16:07:28

You doubt it? In other words you think I'm just making this up?

 

Here is an example. Here's another. There's more rugby talk from Becs on those two threads than there is from your funny guy Moffie on any 6N thread. All he does is bleat and blubber about how boring it all is.


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11071
RE: Mike for the record
February 13, 2013, 16:20:09

Well it was boring rooitwit even though your favourite sides were playing.  Sorry to tell you this but you ought to know. If your sharks team played liked that you would be fuming. When the Stormers side plays dull rugby you are all over them like a rash.  Some consistency rooitwit please.

Moz on the other hand has berated the dull Stormers play and is consistent in also giving the NH sides the same when warranted.  Likewise Mike.

Pop goes the weasel

 


bluebok

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1149
RE: Mike for the record
February 13, 2013, 16:31:53

Not gonna follow the links Jala....cos I AM lazy, but I can also log on as another poster and talk rugby, so it doesn't really prove anything, one way or the other.

 

Here is a fact for you though, NH rugby is not on par with SH rugby. That is a fact. That is why NZ, RSA and AUS have dominated the top three places in the world since 2003. Bottom line, NH rugby is not as good as SH rugby, and therefore BORING~!


Jalapeno!

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 602
RE: Mike for the record
February 13, 2013, 17:14:38

Good heavens, that really is lazy! I even took the trouble to make them into links for you.

 

No matter, but I understood your original comment to have been about whether becs makes rugby contributions or not, now it seems to have changed and it's about whether the SH is better than the NH at rugby.

 

Not quite sure which comment of mine you interpreted as meaning that I think the NH rugby is suddenly better than the SH, but whatever else, you do have a rather original definition of what a "fact" is. Doesn't matter how many times I read your last paragraph, it still sounds like opinion to me.

 

 


Eukanuba

Status: Orange peeler
Posts: 21
RE: Mike for the record
February 13, 2013, 18:21:18

Beeno1. If you have such issues with the Supersupporter board, why oh why, do you keep on trying to sneak back?

You do know that your latest effort was exposed with your very first post?  Its a big joke over there. Bwahahaha. But never mind, your account remains open to pop in try to convince them otherwise.

Perhaps you really need to explain nicely to your friends here why you continue to diss SUPERSUPPORTER and the posters there, when in reality you would return there in a heartbeat.

 

 


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 7867
RE: Mike for the record
February 13, 2013, 18:24:24

You might ask yourself the same question.


Eukanuba

Status: Orange peeler
Posts: 21
RE: Mike for the record
February 13, 2013, 18:37:29

And what question would that be, Mozart?


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
RE: Mike for the record
February 13, 2013, 18:43:27

What a pathetic ignorant take by bluebok, who is this idiot


becs

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 604
RE: Mike for the record
February 13, 2013, 21:40:16

Well, Bluebok, you're wrong on many counts but the main one is that I'm actually not Saffex, I am a female and my picture is currently running alongside this page as one of the sarugby Facebook members.

 

I will happily talk Rugby all day long with anyone, however you seem to be one of those pathetic and sad individuals whose main discussion thread would be that SH Rugby is fantastic, NH Rugby is useless. So that would deem you both an idiot and lacking in any Rugby knowledge whatsoever.


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 02:10:42

 Love it when you talk dirty girl!!


bluebok

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1149
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 09:46:02

Oh Saff, your insults cut so deep...please stop!! Lets see Saff, I've made 680 posts, and you ask who I am? I guess I am not the only idiot!

 

And becs, answer me this, is SH rugby of a better quality than NH rugby? Yes or no is all you need to say. Anyway, I'll watch any rugby, NH, Varsity cup, Force vs Rebels, cos I love the game, but when last I checked people were free to state that one competition, country, group of countries was better than another. I had no idea that mentioning that SH rugby was better than NH rugby, was some sort of cardinal sin! I will not do it ever again, as I truly fear an eternity of damnation for its very mention! 


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 11:35:51

Well bluebok, you have obviously made stuff all impression in those 681 posts because I dont know who you are. Judging from your posts above, you sound like an ill informed twat and I'll leave it at that


bluebok

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1149
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 11:55:22

Oh no...my self image has just been shattered...i did not impress Saff!! Is life now really worth living? I will now endevour to become more informed....Still, 680 posts and you haven't noticed my name...hahahaha...obviously you were in the shallow end of the gene pool!!!

 

Dude, you are too serious. I am just pulling your chain. If you still want to trade insults, I'll oblige, but I'd rather just talk rugby. I only involve myself in the petty stuff out of a lack other other things to chat about.  


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 12:03:38

Yeah, my opinion has not changed - you are a twat

 

Feel free to jump off a bridge, you wont be missed


bluebok

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1149
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 12:09:03

Your comebacks are just too good! How do I respond to your superior wit? Tell you what, why don't YOU just leave and go to another country, you won't be missed..... nevermind!


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 12:23:43

Here is a comeback for you to take in - piss off


bluebok

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1149
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 12:28:46

Brilliant!! That is right up there with ' your mother '.  


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 12:29:56

Glad to be of service, now run along


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11071
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 13:10:11

Hey rooitwit you are so lazy you pretend to read posts - but it could just be an escape route when it becomes apparent you dont have a  clue.

Now stop calling Bluebok lazy as he does read the posts. Got it. Run along now.

 


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 7867
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 14:37:03

For the record bluebok I have read your material on a regular basis, and enjoy your stuff keep it coming.

 

As for old Sapp, he has posted 3329 times and I cant recall anything sensible he has said.  And he complains about your modest 688 posts!

 

The truth is he posts as avidly on another site, and holds down a legal job, where you charge clients for your time. I wonder who was charged for his 3329 postings on here, most of which are made during the business day. Look at it this way, either he never billed the time......and screwed his firm, or he billed the time and screwed his clients.


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 16:08:01

Wow Moffie, the exposed liar now out brown nosing bluebok, would that be because he has lost his buddy Denny who exposed him as a liar.

 

Yeah its great being the boss, with it comes plenty of time to kick your sorry lying arse

 

SPLAT, still smarting I see - poor Moffie, down and out and looking for friends - sic


bluebok

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1149
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 16:08:15

He reminds me of the delightful PraatEkLuister from a few years back on this site. Just argued with everyone regardless of the topic. It would be a little more interesting if he could come up with something original to say, but it is starting to look as though when he is backed into a corner, his limited imagination can do nothing but fling insults. Oh well, each time he has a weak reply to someone's comment, he only proves his own inadequacy.


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 16:31:20

Ah wow look little bluebok is setting up his stall to be taken under Moffie's wing, how cute.

 

Just a pity you are too damn stupid and ignorant to realise that you and conversing with the master of arguing for the sake of it.

 

Here is another weak response from me - you are one stupid prick, hope Moffie handles you with care


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 7867
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 16:36:54

I read a short story once, entitled Mr Contrary......that be Dave de Flatus. I notice you are still on here wasting client time Dave. Unless of course, as you imply, your time has no practical value


bluebok

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1149
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 16:42:29

SO, I'm stupid, a prick, a brown noser, a twat, pathetic, ignorant, an idiot, and I should piss off! In just one thread!! Delightful!!! You must have been thinking really hard about all that. A sign of the true genius you think you are. Want to insult me some more? Because being as intelligent as you are, you've obviously realised that your insults are working on me and by hurling more of them at me, everyone on here is able to see just what a clever boy you are. So big and brave and clever. The envy of every other poster.


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 16:42:52

Moffie, what I do with my time, has fuck all to do with you

 

Your first line smacks of hypocrisy LIAR


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 7867
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 16:45:06

So who was ripped as you made that posting....your client or your firm?


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 16:49:44

I'll be charging the client time - for thinking and considering!!!!


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 7867
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 17:45:28

Gotcha Yellow Dave....it was the client's turn to get screwed.


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 18:36:34

Man you are stupid


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 7867
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 18:47:40

Sure Yellow.....but tell me, is this latest posting for the firm or the client.


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 18:53:02

LIAR you are one thick plank - !!!!! hook line and sinker bwhaaahaaaa

 

SPLAT, you spoken to Denny yet you stupid man - wow did he expose you - must be tough hey KKK


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 7867
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 18:59:03

Well it's either firm time lost or client time fraudulently billed. It seems you are keeping your bosses happy and shafting the client. Isn't that illegal Yellow?


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 19:01:51

What I do with my time as I said has stuff all to do with you. I dont have bosses, I am the boss


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 7867
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 19:04:01

So you are the head of your own law firm, is that what you are telling us Yellow?

 

But I guess it's that time again...have to update the old braggart file.


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 19:07:19

Nope KKK its not my law firm


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 7867
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 19:08:29

Never thought it was Yellow.


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 19:10:11

You asked the question LIAR


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 7867
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 19:20:07

Well who cares who asked the question...as long as we are clear you have a boss.


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 19:23:40

KKK who said I had a boss dumbass?


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 7867
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 19:31:57

Well this is becoming interesting. You have no boss. But you don't have your own law firm. It seems we have discovered a new form of company governance. So how does this work Yellow.....the firm just runs itself and the partners don't review other partners?


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 19:40:19

KKK partners dont come into the equation.

 

 


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 7867
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 19:49:00

Why don't you explain it to us Yellow Belly. You are a boss, but you have no boss? I'm truly interested.


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 22:55:08

 LIAR I dont need to explain anything to you, what difference would it make to a pathetic individual like you anyway.

 

If I say I dont have to answer to anyone with regards to the work I do then take my word for it or piss off - either way it makes no difference.

 

For all you care we could all be a bunch of faries with a few fairy godmothers running the show


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 7867
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 23:21:24

Chickening out again yellow belly. What a coward! But sure if you want me to think of you as a fairy I will.

 

So now we have to believe, you don't have your own law firm , but you have no boss.....even though you are a boss. You couldn't make this stuff up, even if you believe in fairies as you apparently do.


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
RE: Mike for the record
February 14, 2013, 23:50:16

 Moffie, aka KKK, I am not going to indulge you with the make-up of the firm I work for, the value of my property or anything of the sort, for you are nobody in my life but a cyber matt to wipe my feet on.

 

I am bored with all this really, but you know me, I will soldier on as always

 

I have achieved my goal and that was, with the help of fellow posters, including your friend Denny,  to expose you for the liar you are.

 

You can stamp your feet, call me a yellow belly, short, fat or greasy, you name it - its all shallow, fabricated shit backed by the evidence that you have been exposed as a liar


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 7867
RE: Mike for the record
February 15, 2013, 00:07:23

Well Yellow Dave, the one positive is you are off the clients' clock for a few days.


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8533
RE: Mike for the record
February 15, 2013, 00:23:43

 Dont you worry about my clients KKK, if I have any, all is well with the mothership.


Leave a reply:

You need to be logged in to leave a reply.
 
 

From The Sideline