The Ruckers Forum

Forum » Rugby » General Stuff » Rugby content of a rival site
Login to reply
 
 
 
3565 Topic: Rugby content of a rival site
mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8175
Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 18:15:03

A year ago SS dominated this site in terms of activity. Well I just popped over there to check things out after Taipan came over here mouthing off. This is what I found:

 

Of the 8 top rugby topics, three were started today.....one a New Year Greeting. Others were started on January 10, 9 and 8.....December 19 and , get this November 2010. The weighty topics on rugby had headings like:  Stormers Squad and Bulls Squad. There was also one moan about SARU.

 

The problem with this site is exactly what we have been debating here.....censorship (over there)  versus Freedom of Speech (here). That clinging Big Brother stuff causes their chaps to come over here all the time.....disguised as Capone or Bongo Bongo to finger two of the latest ones. They actually have a closed section for gossip....which Bedpan alluded to in his bleat.

 

Why do they come here and nobody here shows any inclination to go there....except of course the stooges who post under false names and then pretend to reject this site.

 

We are many, we are irrereverent   and  we are diverse. This place is hopping that's  why we are so interesting to them. They by contrast are verkrampt and controlling. And worst of all anti WP.


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11404
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 18:55:40

Spot on Moz, bad moderation kills a board and when you have a dull, heavy handed, threatening approach you end up in the mess they are in. Interfering at every turn and throwing your weight about is fatal.

Hopefully they will eventually learn that people are their most precious assets and show them a modicum of respect and dealy fairly, impartially and honestly with them. Simple really.

All a great pity.

Its so dull their major interest in life is whats going on here!!! Fact.

ou windpomp was so narked that we unmasked his disguise and forced a confession. No doubt he registered here under a false name so he wouldnt fall foul of baas hawker. Hahahahahahahhaha ou windpomp is full of hot air.

Then we have wee bedpan strutting about trying to make folk think he is a genuine man! Hahahahahahahaha what a wimp.

Believe when I tell you we are the sun moon and stars for some of them. So they come here in disguise through fear of hawker and us I guess. But are we so mean - I dont think so. 

 

 


taipan57

Status: Orange peeler
Posts: 37
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 19:49:11

 Rugby content, ah well

 



Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11404
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 20:11:30

Bwahahahaha the hotest topic is started in Nov 2010.  Bwahahahaha and its about us. well we are living iit while you pine away bedapn.


taipan57

Status: Orange peeler
Posts: 37
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 20:18:59

 

 It is common forum equiette not to start continual threads on the same topic 


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11404
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 20:31:56

 bedpan your site has been practically dead and is a shadow of its former self. Twits like you ruined it and turned great posters away.

If ou hawker had half a brain cell he would have given you the boot moons ago. Now you are so bored you spend time here. Exscuse me if I dont think this is totally hilarious. Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha 

I issue an invite to all ss board members who are bored to death to have some fun here. You dont have to dig up a post started in Nov 2010 about folk here to try and entertain yourselves. Come and post here and enjoy some action. Its actually pretty pathetic and sad. 

Generally we dont even think of ss board here until some moles appear . But clearly we are your sun moon and stars. 

Join your few remaining fellow posters here and lighten up and live.

 


taipan57

Status: Orange peeler
Posts: 37
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 20:35:52

 So that's why you tried to sneak back on a couple of months ago?


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8175
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 20:49:51

I am amazed Bedpan actually posted that. Talk about proving a point. Dull as it comes......the funny thing is RooiAAS left that Board before me, and his post is still Top of the Pops. Apparently it's common "equiette", whatever that is, to lump all rugby thoughts under dull headings like "Bools Squad".


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11404
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 20:58:38

 No bedpan I have a sense of fun and thought it would be nice to say hi to a few remaining folk there. I knew it could not last long as I used the same sercive provider and equipment.  Amazed that I actually got onto the board at all given his one click german efficiency!!  Of course ou hawker woke up at last and I was banned immediately.  

I see he is still so officious and guess that wont change. Still moving posts about and censoring anything he finds unsuitable. Not for the free bedpan more for servile gimps liike you. One cannot help but notice how you all pussey foot around ou hawker and how dull the outcome has been.

Moz is correct - freedom is for the  free - servitude is for the servants and leads to dullness and mediocrity. Men want freedom slaves want a baas. hawker is your baas and you have what you deserve and perhaps even want.

What must astonish ou hawker is that this board is now substantially bigger than the relatively small ss board. Thats what happens when one can enjoy freedom. Its what most normal folk enjoy. But gimps will be gimps.

Now we are wasting time on all this stuff. hawker call your gimp to order and we can all forget about this and continue. He is no credit to you and you should confine him to gossip girls! Hahahahahahahahaha trouble is that gimps are seldom a credit to anyone.

 

 


taipan57

Status: Orange peeler
Posts: 37
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 21:03:21

 Care to explain why a thread was deleted form this very forum today?

 

It was started by Capone if you need help


taipan57

Status: Orange peeler
Posts: 37
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 21:05:07

Um hawk knew it immediately. We deciided to lay with you. You are so thick you didn't even realise that..


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8175
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 21:06:32

Hell Dumpy Dave versus Andy Murray at 113 replies, is about to pass their top three rugby posts at 121 combined replies. And it was started last Sunday, not early in January....hehehe!


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11404
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 21:08:21

 Moz its astounding. Ou bedpan tries to advertise ss board here. The hot topic is a November 2010 post started by rooinek and all about members here!!! Its so pathetic its hilarious and of course sad at the same time. We get on with things here and dont mention them. They are so bankrupt that talking about us is the bright spot of their dull days. 

Moz I felt compelled to offer them an invitation to get some relief from the boredom. However they are afraid of baas hawker methinks and us as well - but we are not really mean are we?

Bedpan's master hawker must be fuming!!!  He should confine ou bedpan to gossip girls promptly. Hahahahahahahahaha bedpan is a PR disaster.

 


taipan57

Status: Orange peeler
Posts: 37
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 21:11:47

 So the top thread here is about Saffex as compared to an actual rugby thread.

 

Thanks for that. 


Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8735
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 21:16:54

I'm very popular here taip, don't steal my thunder - some want to even pick me up from the airport!!


DbDraad

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1007
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 21:17:43

 Moz and Beeno, I can't see the reason why you guys need to compare the 2 sites. It is my choice to post on both, and I enjoy both. 

The reason why there is a topic on there that dates from way back, is because I went back and dug up an old post by Rooinek just for the hell of it. You see, on that site it is quite possible to go back to the beginning and reply on a topic that is 3 years old. You all would agree that that site is technically just about as good as it gets.
I was one of a few that was disappointed that you left as I also believe in diversity of opinion and I even like the argie bargie. Since you left, the fighting basically stopped and yes, when the rugby stops it can be a bit quiet at times.
 It is also true that there has been more traffic over here lately, but most of it was handbag stuff. It is however good for laughs until the rugby starts again and will add spice to things when the rugby is here. I like the fact that there is a bigger international flavor to this site, and it would be nice if can grow some more.
I do not know who Bongi is, but I agree that it is someone who knows what's what over at SS. Curiosity nags me as well, but I guess we should wait and see who he turns out to be.
BTW, who is Capone/ Clown/ CleanCut, I can't recall him from either Supersupporter nor Supersport?








 
 
 


taipan57

Status: Orange peeler
Posts: 37
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 21:21:29

 Jealousy Draad, jealousy. 


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11404
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 21:24:31

 Bedpan you plank the top site you list is about us and is pure skinner. Gossip girl stuff. 

Ou hawker is slipping up and dont be surprised if he moves the thread to gossip girls where the girls can enjoy talking about us  - their sun moon and stars. Hahahahahahahahahhaha - you may aswell close down the rugby and go gossiping full time. Bwahahahaahahahahaha - its what you girls do best. The few remaining ss men should join us and enjoy some fun. FREEDOM! 

 

 


DbDraad

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1007
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 21:26:22

 "I knew it could not last long as I used the same sercive provider and equipment.  Amazed that I actually got onto the board at all given his one click german efficiency!!"


LMAO, good one Beenz, but you are wrong, he was onto you in no time, and you were not banned immediately, your profile was still active after you left, presuming you would be banned when you were found out. BTW, your cameo as Stormerrule was just about the same thing as what Bongi is doing ATM. No harm in it.


taipan57

Status: Orange peeler
Posts: 37
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 21:30:38

 True Draad we were all in on the gag and played with him.

 

The fool thought he was getting away with it.

 

Or should we discuss Barca Boy amd how Beeno brown nosed him?


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11404
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 21:47:37

 Draad you are a decent type as is Bobbok as are some others there although so many have left. 

Unfortunately poor moderation led to the split. 

Bye the way I didnt leave ss board I was banned. Please be clear on that . I had an undertaking from ou hawker that I could post on both boards provided I said nothing against SS board. Dispite that I was banned having done no wrong up to that point. I never got an answer to this from either barlee or hawker. I would have popped in from time to time as I had indicated I would but hawker reneged on his undertaking and banned me with not even the coutesy of an explanation. To this day I dont know why.

Of course now it matters very little as we have made a posting home here and are amazed at the growth of this board and all the fun we have here.

Like you Draad I like diversity and like having that scoundrel snapster and the loose nut rooinek around as well. Its alll grist to the mill and a lot of fun. 

I dont like heavy handedness and the feeling you are here very much at my whim that one gets on ss board. Hopefully they have learnt a very hard lesson and will change their tune and be more appreciative.  With such a small board they could have.

Anyhow I do not wish them ill dispite all the nonsense and just wish they would get over things.   They got it wrong, made the wrong calls and they should big enough to admit it. Remember its not just the 4 of us who left but a whole host of folk. So dont blame the famous 4!

Yes I think Draad this board will grow even more this year and will iin the not too distant future be the top SA rugby site - in traffic. In the meantime we should enjoy the more intimate atmosphere. 

I am sure that the technical side will improve overe time but as things stand we have all we really need and those bells and whistles do not make a board. Its the people who do. We have the people.

I see wee bedpan is yapping at you Now there's a first!

 

 


taipan57

Status: Orange peeler
Posts: 37
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 21:53:31

 Still lying after all these years.


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8175
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 22:02:39

Draad I think you'll find the comparisons  today were started by Taipan ......not yours truly. I agree the SS Board is technically very good, but it has a major issue. No real rugby content. This site provides better coverage and has a longer news reach. All other things being equal that will advantage this site. But all others things aren't equal.

 

1) Your site is webbied by a guy,  who you guys claim from the beginning was onto Beeno and played him. There's your first problem. The Webbie should be neutral....Hawk played favourites and dealt out unequal treatment. That's why I left.!

 

2) Posters from SS are actually afraid of incurring the wrath of the powers that be...a few chaps have told me to keep the source of  information confidential for that reason. Which I have done and will do. Fear of retribution doesn't inspire long term loyalty.

 

3) This thing about lumping things under topics is opaque. A  Board needs new topics or for topics to be refreshed to stimulate discussion. It's the headline that guides one's interest.

 

4) The international perspective is totally absent.

 

5) The anti WP thing on SS was pretty virulent....which I know, at times,  you also found unattractive.

 

So I think there are some headwinds. But plenty of good posters. I would never want to return, and in any case I'm not welcome there. The depth of the antagonism was made very clear to me when, after I announced my departure, Barlee asked me for my ideas to improve the site. I responded in a forthright but completely civilized fashion. Only to hear from another poster that he said he wasn't going to bother replying back. He had his marching orders. That shows the extent to which Hawk dominates the Board and it's founder.

 

The odd thing is, prior to the blow up, I thought he was a balanced level headed guy, not a tin pot dictator.

 

The basic point is, Beeno aside, nobody from here goes onto SS to stir. But we have had several disguised SS posters on here.....stirring. There's no problem if they stay where they are, come here to post rugby or even come here to stir under their usual nicks. But sneaking on here in disguise and then pretending to prefer SS is just a low tactic to try and damage this Board.

 

It won't work, the curves are headed in different directions and this is the site on the rise.


DbDraad

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1007
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 22:09:19

 Beenz, me and Taipan differ on more things than we agree on and had more than our fair share of tiffs, its not yapping, its just differences of opinion and there are no serious insults. I also don't have a pet name for him like you do. :-P He he!


taipan57

Status: Orange peeler
Posts: 37
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 22:14:09

 Ja, Draad that is what adults do. We do not leave forums simply because threads are moved to a general discussion sub forum.


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8175
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 22:20:53

Thanks for that, you admit I left of my own accord. So all those SS refugees who said I was booted out were lying. It's odd how the truth always emerges, mostly spilled by the guys who are lying about you.

 

Now run along sonny boy, you are an empty suit.


taipan57

Status: Orange peeler
Posts: 37
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 22:26:15

 No you left because TC kicked your arse and you couldn't handle it.


DbDraad

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1007
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 22:27:04

 Moz, just a correction, Hawk never played "Stormerule" he gave him the benefit of the doubt. I was the only poepol that did not immediately believe him to be Beeno. There was no "playing" of Beeno and after he affirmed his ID he left on own accord, assuming he was banned, but his profile remained active for a while.

And another thing, there are a lot of history between you guys and some of the SS members that go back a long time before SS. Most of the "moles" on this site turned out to be people that aren't even members of SS any more, like Rooinek for instance.

 

PS: And yes Beeno, I know you were banned after Moz and Denny left and I don't want to go into the details, its all in the past.


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11404
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 22:29:24

 Draad I was posting on shoutbox when I was completely cut off. I could not post a thing.Actually Icoulnt make a normal post but thesystem allowed me to post on shoutbox. That loophole is probly closed as ou hawker musyt have been fuming to realsie i wasstill having my say. Hahahahahahah

Pease understand that .It reminds of an earlier banning. The board was told I had left of my own accord when I had been banned!!!!  You probably remember the uproar  -ou dorkie had been calling me a wanker for about two weeks I replied in kind once and was banned as my reply had poor dorkie in tears. Barlee of course reversed the banning as it was rediculous and dorkie was inconsolable. But it was given out that I had left of my own accord. a blatant LIE

I saw your post saying we left of our own choice. That is a total lie I was banned. No problem but that statement is not correct. 

It was this basic dishonesty that also caused a big problem. Somebody was lying.

Note also a difference I went on as Stormerrule in disguise as Beeno was not allowed. A few twits come here in disguise when there is no need for it.

As for Barlee he puzzles me. He seems a really nice guy and yet he suddenly goes ape. I think he has been influenced by malignant persons lieing in his ear. 

A great pity it was for a good group of peopel had gathered there but a few bad apples and immature and biased moderation ruined it. The joke is we are the villains but why have so many left with no help from us. They need to honestly face up to this and admit we were not the problem . How is it this board is flourishing? They should be flourishing and we perishing in the wilderness as hawker predicted.

No immature moderation and some very bad apples sunk them. Have they learnt the lessons, can they front up. All very regrettable and unfortunate stuff.

 

 

 


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8175
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 22:29:44

Just another lie, but at least we have disposed of the one....thanks for that!


taipan57

Status: Orange peeler
Posts: 37
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 22:33:17

Beeno still peddling the same lies.


DbDraad

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1007
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 22:34:48

 Beeno, I do not blame either side for whatever happened. Divorce is never easy. lol.

Lets leave it at that. If I thought you lot were arseholes, I would never have bothered resuming posting here and vice versa. Let it be, its in the past now. Rather concentrate on educating Brycy and co.


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11404
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 22:39:37

 Draad! I was banned even as I was posting on shoutbox!  I came back after being banned to see what was hapening and saw my Stormerrule name came up at the bottom where you could see who is visiting the site but was blocked from posting. Saw ou bedapn saying it was cowardly for me to come in disguise until the twit was told I would not be able to come as Beeno. Bwahahaahahaha ou bedapan makes an ass of himself on a daily basis.

I trust you are not suggesting I was able to post anything and left of my own accord!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Man wise up and dont suck things up so easily. I was cut off even as I was busy on shoutbox that evening. Man I can hardly credit this deceit.

 

 


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8175
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 22:40:45

I'm recieving you loud and clear brother Draad.


taipan57

Status: Orange peeler
Posts: 37
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 22:59:12

Man Beeno you are thick. Of course you couldn't come back as Beeno as you were banned. Do you understand the meaning of banned? That is why your new ID was banned. I know for a fact that barlee and hawk monitor the ISP address of every new applicant, that is why they immediately knew it was you and decided to have some fun.


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8175
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 23:06:15

Thanks again for confirming the point.....the two editors decided to try and have some fun at a poster's expense.


taipan57

Status: Orange peeler
Posts: 37
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 23:08:08

 Yep, one who registered under false pretenses.


Apollo

Status: Orange peeler
Posts: 29
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 23:08:58

Hmmm... Interesting for the original poster to market the rival site so effectively...

 

On their front page there are 27 rugby related posts out of 30, with an average of about 31 replies per thread.

 

On this site rugby related posts RARELY reaches 20 replies per thread... A lot of the posts on the front page here are "my dick is bigger than yours" and it seems those are the ONLY threads that get replies/dicussion. I prefer discussing rugby, so I think I'll join over there...

 

Thanks for the tip!!! ;-)


taipan57

Status: Orange peeler
Posts: 37
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 23:11:25

 Welcome.


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8175
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 30, 2013, 23:28:34

Another mole emerges. So he likes the fact that each rugby post has more replies. But the fact that SS has a policy of lumping posts under one heading.....goes woosh over the poor dopes stone head! How many stupid people can they send over here?


DbDraad

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1007
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 31, 2013, 00:10:15

 Nobody was sent, your fans followed you. They willl never admit to it, but they miss you guys!


Apollo

Status: Orange peeler
Posts: 29
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 31, 2013, 00:16:42

A "mole"???? "sent"???... For fuck sakes... You have SERIOUS issues with the other site... and some SERIOUS paranoia....

 

Just waiting for them to validate my account...


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8175
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 31, 2013, 00:27:40

Sayonara Apollo, Zeus hardly knew you!


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11404
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 31, 2013, 08:40:04

Draad I know we are missed. I saw Stu saying as much ! However we are persona non grata with the pwoers that be so I can think of only one solution. Post on two boards. As it stands right now most of the few ss supporters are here in any event.

Draad I would like clarity on one issue. Was it put out that Stormerrrule was not banned and could access the site. I.e. that I left of my own accord? If so that is a blatant lie - just like that other lie about my leaving when I was banned. I will take your silence to be your confirming that you thought Stormerrule had access to the site to post and that I had left of my own accord -ie that you had been lied to again.

Ou apollo is another mole as we know  - amazing how these moles pop up all at the same time! Now he is  telling us he is joining the site where he is already a member. Hahhahahahahaha hilarious stuff. Oh my aching sides. ROTFL    ROTFL    ROTFL

Moz look at the date of the first post in a thread - they go back months - its gives the impression they are busy. Have a few thread and keep em going for months. Hahahahhahahaha that fools only a fool. Further many individual posts are half liners. I keep an eye on them but find it now only takes a moment and I am done.

Stu needs to understand a once vibrant board has all but collapsed due to all the many departures. No use quoting stats based on what used to be Stu.  Some serious soul searching nees to be done.

Also stu needs to honestly admit that while certain ss board mmebers have been very busy gossiping about us ceaselessly we have been getting on with things with no comment about them for many a month -everyone knows this is an undisputable fact. Now that Moz makes a few observations about ss board (Arising as a consequenc eof the moles getting active again) stu feels agrieved - although he does say he has nothing against Moz. Stu try and be reasonable - you cant gossip all day and night about SA Rugby , have moles on here etc and expect no comment from this side.

Stu if you want to discuss matters and relieve your boredom, which is plainly widespread there,  come and chat. You are a member here after all - Stu5 is it. Don't let hawker intimidate you. Hahahhahaha some folk tend to be timid and need encouragement to step out and be bold - face down the wee bad wolf etc.

 

 

 


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11404
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 31, 2013, 08:49:14

"We do not leave forums simply because threads are moved to a general discussion sub forum". Say ou bedpan

Rooinek rightly got pissed of by the heavy handed interference as well and left because of it.

ou bedpan couldn't get it more wrong if he tried. Moz left because he chose to not as bedpan has claimed because Moz was booted off. In the next breath its Moz left because of moved thread!  Then its we chose to leave. Well I was banned.

Bwahahahahahha talk about being dumb!!  A more confused dope would be hard to find.


blobbok

Status: Squad member
Posts: 593
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 31, 2013, 10:59:08

Dbdraad, ons praat dieselfde taal, & I'm glad all em oaks are popping up , adding to this MB's boards vitality ................. regards .

 

Beano, howsa new job ?


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11404
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 31, 2013, 11:27:30

Hi there Bobbok. I am fine but still at the old job as they asked me to stay on till end of June as the hand over was not complete. After that I intend doing a bit of lucrative consulting or merely being a gentleman with more leisure. The latter will give me more time to help out snapster and rooitiwt! Hahhahahaha

Lots of blah blah going on but we are still all in one piece here and looking forward to a bumber year highlighting the Mighty Stormers and the Boks of course.

Is Owen getting worried about the Lions on Saturday I wonder. Die ou blou majien legends have been stutterring a bit!  Tell him Beeno says the bulle should do okay this season and play a valuable role in preparing the Stormers march to the title. Hahahahahhahahahahaha it will cheer him up to know the bulle can still be useful.


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8175
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 31, 2013, 11:31:46

Hasbeen have you considered that perhaps all these okes from SS  are not coming over here to stir. Perhaps it's just a case of finding a new home, because their ship has developed a serious leak. Rats leaving a sinking ship, as it were?


blobbok

Status: Squad member
Posts: 593
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 31, 2013, 11:48:52

Mofart, what are you on about ?? Can't an oak post here, there & everywhere without being a rat leaving a 'sinking ship '?


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8175
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 31, 2013, 11:52:46

Figure of speech, in your case more of a cat leaving a sinking ship. But sure blobboop I have always favoured complete freedom to post. Never thought I'd say this given our history, but I enjoy having your dry sense of humour on here, with your occasional visits.


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11404
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 31, 2013, 12:31:30

Moz some are just rugby lovers and have no agenda, others have an agenda.

However in the end  it matters not that much - all are bored and all are welcome even ou taipansy!  Its all grist to the mill. As Moz says let folk post where they like - its a open site this and for that we are all thankful.

BobBok its great you and Draad post  here. Let folk do as they please.

 

 


Denny

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1694
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 31, 2013, 13:24:44

I've been away from the MB for a few days but scrolling down the board I see quite a bit of activity from a few moles. Firstly we welcome your prescence and while I understand you will never have anything nice too say about us and this site let me say you are entitled to your opinions.

But here's the slowdown, if we're as bad as you say we are and seeing you rejoiced upon us leaving, may I ask, what are you trying to prove by visiting this site?

 

Surely, you can only repeat what you've previously said and no amount of spilling your bile is going to cause anyone to lose any sleep........personally I think you lot are bored shitless and deep down you opine our departure from SS.

 

But hey, hang around, there is no doubt your prescence has increased activity.


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11404
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 31, 2013, 13:33:53

Some are bad eggs and some are good guys. Not a problem.


DbDraad

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1007
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 31, 2013, 14:43:08

 Beeno, no discussions regarding the issue after your cameo as SR that I can recall. I assumed SR was deleted because your true identity surfaced. However, at some stage after that, I was going through some of the older posts, to catch up on some of the stuff I've missed. I accidentally clicked on your profile, which transferred me to the "members" section and at that stage your profile was still indicated as "active". Thats when I wrongly figured you were not banned but you might have assumed you were. I gues I was wrong.


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11404
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 31, 2013, 14:54:40

Thanks Draad that clears that one up. I have no idea why my profile was active  but I was unable to post. However I did not want it being passed off as my  leaving (as happened previously) when the truth was I was in fact banned. 

Let the truth stand.

 


Jalapeno!

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 602
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 31, 2013, 15:28:03

Baboon-ou, not to rub salt on old wounds but I must say, you always sound very emotional when you talk about your banning from the Super Supporter forum. I wasn't around at the time so I don't know the details but whatever happened, it sounds like you might want to get some therapy. You always sound as if you're about to burst into tears when the subject of your banning comes up.

 

Talking of Super Supporter, I just had a quick look on there and I see the Mods had a very different view of Moffie's recent claim that he left there amicably and without any acrimony. Seems Moffie threw a tantrum and nearly had a nervous breakdown when he realized he wasn't really wanted and everyone thought he was a complete dickhead. Must say, I don't have a lot of sympathy for any of you. I warned you lot about the over-moderating on that site at least two years ago and I've been telling people what a childish, spiteful and despicable human being Moffie is for a lot longer than that.

 

Anyway, Baboon-ou, back to your banning and the mental anguish it caused you, if you want to have a little snivel about the injustice of it all, post it here and I'll at least pretend to read it. Okay? Dry your eyes now . . . there's a big boy!


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11404
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 31, 2013, 15:47:14

rooitwit you had at some point in your life to b eright and youwere about over mderation. I think everyone realises that.

The bannings were unjust and except for the last one overturned. No I am not crying about overturned bannings rooitwit. what I am doing is holding people to account for lieing etc.  So when they pitch up here I hold them to account and try to ensure the truth stands.

Thanks for all your deep concern rooitwt. I never knew you had it in you - the concern is of course misplaced but at least you tried. Bwaahhahahahaha ou rooitwit struggling in unfamiliar territory!

Judging from your uniformed responses it also appears you pretend to read many a post Hahahahahahhahaha this coud explain a lot.

 


BonganiP

Status: Baby Bok
Posts: 229
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 31, 2013, 16:00:36

 Now watch how this vegetable, Beeno, turns himself into the pot calling the kettle black. He says that he registered as "Stormerrule" because he could not reregister as Beeno. If this was the case, and if he was so different from others who posted on here, then why did he not immediately spill the beans? Why did he try and fool everybody into believing he was not Beeno? Nice try old Meerkat penis, nice try.

 

PS. Jalapeno, thanks for offering him some support, because the old pickled goat testicle won't have time for that as well. He is too busy fixing Denny fresh bottles, wiping his bum, changing his diapers, etc, etc. 


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11404
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 31, 2013, 16:25:14

A couple of things for your lonely brain cell to appreciate. Firstly by the time I went onto ss baord as the now famous Stormerrule we had had dozens of moles on here so it was time for a reply and some fun.

Secondly, it was bound to be a short visit as I was using the same servie provider and device so it surprised me that ou hawker didnt twigg immediately. I had the oaks there completely fooled and poor stu asking me to stay, Mata had fallen for me and all was going well until ou hawker awake from his slumber as did ou barlee etc. ROTFL

I do realise bongi you want it all one way traffic but that is not how it works in real life. Anyhow I know many folk there actually enjoyed my brief visit and i thought I conducted myself superbly as Mata will attest to.

Lastly the moles who come here are free to come and could easily use their real identities. I couldnt do that and get onto ss baord as Iwas banned. Can you spot the difference bongi ya half wit  - even that notable plank taipansy eventually got it. A tip for you. You can tell us what your ss board name is and you will NOT be banned here. Getting a glimmer?

So what is your ss board name bung i. Or are you still so terrified. Hahahahahhahahaha crash goes the bung i who has a dorkishness about him. Has the crudeness of taipansy as well.  Meerkat penis - thats a  new one.  

 


Goodman

Status: Orange peeler
Posts: 97
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 31, 2013, 17:15:31

Any Sharks fans here ?


Super Pat

Status: Ref
Posts: 16
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 31, 2013, 17:49:57

They're all on Supersupporter.


sasuke uchiha

Status: Rugby Legend
Posts: 5824
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 31, 2013, 18:17:46

@goodman,

 

soory bro, i think the chief fans ate the last one last year, when they deep fried them and ate them with chips at the spXV  finals,,,,hmmmmm, pass the watties sauce, :oP

 

but seriously, ol clevermike and sharkbok are staunch shark supporters, :o)


Goodman

Status: Orange peeler
Posts: 97
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 31, 2013, 18:42:15

Good, glad there are some around. I have had to sift through too much crap to find out where the rugby folk are. short supply. Already made a note of who the people are to steer clear of.


BonganiP

Status: Baby Bok
Posts: 229
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 31, 2013, 18:54:09

 Beeno, you old meerkat penis you. You want to know when I am going to tell you who I am? OK. I will tell you

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

on Monday.

 

I will also, on Monday, tell you the answer to his question;

How do you keep a turd in suspence.


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8175
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 31, 2013, 20:42:37

Don't bother, you're more of a type than a person. I couldn't care less who you are.


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8175
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
January 31, 2013, 21:07:03

I see after one day this topic about a rival site is closing in on the 3rd most frequented, non archived topic,  on that very site....... posted over 2 weeks ago. The juice is with us!


Goodman

Status: Orange peeler
Posts: 97
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
February 01, 2013, 11:16:56

Mozart. Is this your site ? You seem to have a lot of emotion entrenched in it.


BonganiP

Status: Baby Bok
Posts: 229
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
February 01, 2013, 12:05:33

Piss of you senile old fool. are you too stupid to note that I was talking to that bird-brained, wanabee CA, lapdog of yours?


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11404
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
February 01, 2013, 13:40:36

bongi you are sounding more and more unhinged as times goes by. Ou bedpan was always desparately jealous of my being a CA and even when hawker confirmed it as being so he could not accept it. Bwahahahahahahahhahahaha

bongi do you know anything about rugby at all - if so lets here about it.


BonganiP

Status: Baby Bok
Posts: 229
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
February 01, 2013, 15:22:26

 Oh please ou Meerkat. We all know how many certificates and crap are forged in SA. Even our passports are seen as being dodgy, by many countries. We have as much confirmation of your CA as as we have confirmation of the senile old goat testicle's Wallmart PhD.

 

Judged by the crap you post, and the way you argue, you have probably bought yours somewhere in Khyalitsha. Or did you buy it in Zim? 


Stormer77

Status: Orange peeler
Posts: 76
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
February 02, 2013, 19:49:05

 is SS SuperSport or Super Supporter????


Denny

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1694
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
February 03, 2013, 03:04:46

It seems like the vast majority of  moles who invaded this forum have crept back into their hole at SS. Whilst I welcome a variety of differing opinions one would have to say It's clear that they weren't here to debate, no, they were here to slag off and to re-gurgitate old baggage. Noticeably none posted under their known nicks, rather cowardly they hide behind nicks only known to themselves and perhaps other likewise moles from SS. Suddenly unknown nicks like Apollo and Super Pat appeared , no doubt they are known to us under different nicks, "Apollo" threatening to diss this site and to re-locate himself on SS...... a quick site inspection of SS and there is no visble evidence of  a poster by that nick...now why does that not surprise me!? Secondly "Apollo" if you dislike this site so bad, don't bother trying to fix it, bag it like the coward you are, then rack off like you promised you would .... and OBTHW, make sure you bolt the door behind you. I promise I'll pretend to miss you...as if!

As for the psuedo holier than thou "Bog-anni" ....another Troll using a false nick, now that you've finished ranting and raving like a stark raving Lunatic....care to to finally tell us why you are hiding behind a false nick, maybe if you did, I'd be able to attach some credibility to your mindless squawking and squealing.

 

 

My final message to these immature and hate driven moles, is this....this site will survive and grow in membership with or without your hate driven agenda, right now as we speak I'm on another membership drive, thanks for spurring me on, it's clear to me that our prescence bothers you, on the contrary your existence and mindless rants makes no impression on us or this forum. And as a parting gesture, put this in your pipe as well, to date this Forum has an international prescence, yours doesn't!!


Super Pat

Status: Ref
Posts: 16
RE: Rugby content of a rival site
February 03, 2013, 11:26:53

Denny, you twit, Apollo only joined SS on 30 January 2013.

 

Apollo

Member Since 30 Jan 2013
Offline Last Active Jan 31 2013 09:59 PM

-----

Community Stats


  • Group Members
  • Active Posts 3
  • Profile Views 16
  • Member Title n00b
  • Age 26 years old
  • Birthday July 26, 1986
  • Gender
    Male Male
  • Location
    Pretoria


Leave a reply:

You need to be logged in to leave a reply.
 
 

From The Sideline