Are the humiliated abs as bad as the showed against England?
December 03, 2012, 08:58:58
Well the answer is yes as there were no extenuating cir[removed]stances at all.
Now the kiwi bird brains harp on about how this is their first loss in 20 games. Well of course herein lies their big problem and why this loss is such a shock to them and not of course to Beeno. You will of course recall how I said England could give the abs a hard time. My only concern was how much the tough games against Oz and the Boks would have taken out of them.
Now how did the very astute Beeno get it right and so many never saw this coming? Well one simple bit of advice to the oaks - look beyond the scoreboard.
Lets go back to the rugbyWC. The abs notoriously eliminanted the Boks via their get the yarpies campain and used the equally notorious BL as the tool. He did an excellent job on the Boks and was made nz ref of the year and was promptly fired by the IRB along with that other unworthy Paddy O'Brien.
So the abs managed to get to the final to play the then medicire France. France however were decidely the better side on the day and but for our own Craig Joubert would have won the world cup. Abs should NEVER have won world cup - they definitel y stole the WC.
Next we come to the Rugby Championship. Move on to Dunedin- a very imprtant clue as to why the abs got thumped by England. Here the Bok forwards munched the wee abs, Unfortunately we had one of the poorest goal kicking displays ever by a bok side and also butchered, a few tries. Given a nomal kicking display etc we would have won by at least as much as England won. Which reflects in our narrow win - so dispised by the Meyer bashers - against England. Like the Boks the England side muched the wee ab forwards, They also kicked their goals and took their try scroing chances. We didnt.
Also who can argue agains the fact that that OZ deserved more than a draw agaisnt nz in that last match with them. No one, Now both OZ and the Boks were suffering numerous injuries an playing severely depleted sides!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
With tears in my eyes I ask, what in the wolrd have these wee abs actually shown? They are a comptetent side and no more. No other conclusion can be reached if you understand rugby and take into account context.
So to conclude the writing is now clearly on the wall as a wise rugby sage said recently!! Question is how well can the abs renew themselves. mcaaaw looks done and dusted andeven carter was wobbly. Nonu and wee conrad were poo rbut carol Jane hada few nice touches.Aaron Smith showed he cracks under pressure etc etc.
Lastly lets face facts Dunedin and Twicks showed how you beat these fancy pants nz sides. Other than some cute passing there is not a great deal more to them. Bwahahahhahahahahaha - they lack mongrel and their fancy backs back be obliterated from the game as we showed in Dunedin and as shown by this very competent England side who the Boks beat with a severely depleted and exhausted team. Please note Kiwi bird brains.
Now kiwi bird brains suck it all up and consider the wise words of Beeno!! All this pain and tears is so unneccessary as you had been warned more than once! Hahhahahahahahaha
Brycy I note is very scarce since his hilariously badly timed remarks about portugal beating the Blitzbpkke. Tha tin comparison brycy i sa nion event Bwahahahahahahaah what a mutt!!!!!!!!!!!!
So to conclude kiwi bird brains must try and be more realistic, look deeper tahn th score etc. Those mocking Meyer should try and reappear from under a heap of egg some time if they can. Bwahahahahhahahahahahahahahaha