The Ruckers Forum

Forum » Rugby » Springboks » What do the Kiwi's have to say now?? Adam Thompson
Login to reply
 
 
 
2958 Topic: What do the Kiwi's have to say now?? Adam Thompson
Boklogic

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1950
What do the Kiwi's have to say now?? Adam Thompson
November 12, 2012, 02:38:59

You all love the Bakkies physicality and Greyling elbows but to ruck a man on the head? Is this thuggery really a one way street?

 

One would argue that Thompson became "frustrated" at the Scot flanker lying over the ball that one time. Well boys, that was "Richie McCaw like" except he does it at 80% of the breakdowns he attends. Can you see how easy it is to become frustrated?? At least Greyling let the man face him. McCaw had the option to retaliate.

 

Seems NZL are edging SA in the "foul play" stakes. It all started back when you used a boxer in your front row, then Brad Thorn's lifting and dumping of John Smit and now this. How that Thorn incident did not warrant much harsher punishment is beyond me. Our guys give your guys little elbows and headbutt's..Who is really the dirty lot?


polyboy

Status: Squad member
Posts: 506
RE: What do the Kiwi's have to say now?? Adam Thompson
November 12, 2012, 04:16:54

I mentioned this in another thread, but by Bakkies physicality you mean when he mounted Jimmy Cowan from behind and then head butted him...yeah that wasn't dirty. The bok fans really are becoming a bunch of softies, cherry picking AB incidents, but convenienty sugar coating Bok indescretions. Rugby is a physical, confrontational sport, incidents legal and illegal happen, the Bok pride themselves on their mythical physicality and their game is try to physically intimidate opposition teams (never works on AB's) yet the Bok posters are quick to have a cry about incidents involving their players. When did an AB sucker punch a player from behind (Andy Dalton) or bite an opponents ear(Sean Fitzpatrick), the media built these up but the involved assaulted players accepted it as a casuality of the game.  I don't condone Thompson's actions, in fact the [removed]head should've been red carded, but indescretions happen with all teams.

 

 

 

 


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11633
RE: What do the Kiwi's have to say now?? Adam Thompson
November 12, 2012, 08:23:24

Boklogic it was poor stuff once again from the kiwis. Of course we have through our illustrious history committed a couple of normally provoked indescretions but nothing remoteley on the scale of nz.

Bye the way Boklogic did you notice how the abs against the Scots used blockers in the backline to manufacture a try. Two forwards - was mccheat invoved - blocked the centers from tackling their opponents - the ball being passed behind these two blockers to players lined up behind the blocker -ous.

Man there has to be a genetic defect at work with the kwi bird brains - Bwahhahahahaahhahahaha they are bent!


poi-e

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 778
RE: What do the Kiwi's have to say now?? Adam Thompson
November 12, 2012, 09:52:48

Pretty silly act, he probably could've pushed his head down with his hand harder than he did with his foot but the IRB will take a hardline view of any foot contact with the head so he's likely to sit out the rest of the tour - couldn't really argue with that ruling to be fair..


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11633
RE: What do the Kiwi's have to say now?? Adam Thompson
November 12, 2012, 12:39:41

pooo to be honest I dont think the incident that bad and perhaps I was a bit hash in my post above  -due no doubt to many years of devious ab play!

The scot was wearing a scrumcap also as I recall and scots are very thick headed so no damage done?

I know one scot who lives under a bridge in scotland and is about as thick as they come. Bwahahahahhahahahaha


bluebok

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1178
RE: What do the Kiwi's have to say now?? Adam Thompson
November 12, 2012, 12:40:33

poi-e Much respect dude! Most of the NZ posters here, like many of the SA posters, can't look at things objectively, you can. Stupid behaviour should be punished, no matter who commits the act.


MO(NH)

Status: Baby Bok
Posts: 143
RE: What do the Kiwi's have to say now?? Adam Thompson
November 12, 2012, 13:01:16

Agree a silly thing to do and deserves to be punished. Don't agree with the remark about the Scots being thick headed a bit pot/kettle me thinks!!


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11633
RE: What do the Kiwi's have to say now?? Adam Thompson
November 12, 2012, 13:10:23

Eeeks Lady MO(NH) still here with us!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Lady MO(NH) if I could get advance warning of you presence I could save my juicy posts for another time!

One scot I saw (That tall blond number 4 lock) was all blue down the side of his arm - is that a  tribal thing for these somewhat primitive scots or just the cold?

 


crazyboutrugby

Status: Ref
Posts: 4
RE: What do the Kiwi's have to say now?? Adam Thompson
November 12, 2012, 13:35:31

In the old days we had linesmen to assist the ref. Nowadays they are called assistant refs and their job is to inform the ref about any infringements or foul play, but also advise the ref as to whether a yellow card/red card/no card should be shown to the transgressor. As the assistant refs are not only assistant refs, but fully coached/trained refs, I fail to see why the assistant refs are so poor in their judgements and advice when they are assistants, but do take full responsibilty when being the ref of a match. Deliberate use of the rugby boots to inflict injury to another players head can ONLY be a RED card...end of story, be it an Irish, English, Aussie, South African or whatever rugby player in the world.

Beeno1...it was so obvious to see the foul play (blocking) by McCheat....well noted.


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11633
RE: What do the Kiwi's have to say now?? Adam Thompson
November 12, 2012, 13:41:49

crazyaboutrugby I seem to recall a fairly light connection with the head. It wasnt as if thompson had stood on him hard and really tried to do damage?
Yes we have seen this move a number of times and invariably leads to a ab try. Refs must start blowing the abs up for this and their traditioanl lying on the wrong side of the ruck etc. Ou mcaaaaw would not need a sabbatical he could just get yellows and sit on the bench all the macth long! Hhahahahahaha


carpetmuncher

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1396
RE: What do the Kiwi's have to say now?? Adam Thompson
November 12, 2012, 16:58:52

i still say that should allow rugby matters ot be sorted out on the pitch way to many nannys on the pitches these days. adam should get a long ban for this.

 

rucking should be part of the game in my view. the game is becoming to over reffed sorry to say


hakwa

Status: Senior player
Posts: 2378
RE: What do the Kiwi's have to say now?? Adam Thompson
November 13, 2012, 11:44:36

 Adam Thomson was innocent! He thought it was the ball he was rucking but on closer inspection....................! 


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11633
RE: What do the Kiwi's have to say now?? Adam Thompson
November 13, 2012, 11:58:31

fair comment hakwa I am sure also tha tThompson is colour blind which wa no ttaken into account.

Face it Thompson is not known for foul play. A one year ban should suffice! Hahahhahahahahahaha

Beeno trying to balance the books


Ceradyne

Status: Senior player
Posts: 3054
RE: What do the Kiwi's have to say now?? Adam Thompson
November 13, 2012, 13:04:08

Isn't that the same Thompson who earned himself an Oscar, and a card for Rory Kockott? LOL.


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11633
RE: What do the Kiwi's have to say now?? Adam Thompson
November 13, 2012, 13:44:20

Oh no you mean he is a serial offender - make that 10 years!  What happened cant recall the incident?


Ceradyne

Status: Senior player
Posts: 3054
RE: What do the Kiwi's have to say now?? Adam Thompson
November 13, 2012, 13:55:39

Kockott gave him a moffie slap, and he fell down lie a ton of bricks. Kockott got suspended and he had a laugh.

 

www.youtube.com/watch

 

Listen to Craig Joubert describing it as a "vicious punch". LOL


hakwa

Status: Senior player
Posts: 2378
RE: What do the Kiwi's have to say now?? Adam Thompson
November 14, 2012, 10:11:05

 you heard it - it was a vicious punch!

and watch the few seconds after as Rory watches in disbelief at Thomson's Hollywood acting as Thomson first staggers (hahahahahaha) and then dives (hahahahaha the italian soccer players couldn't have done better) and then half rolls clutching at his face - bwhahahahahahahahah!

 


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11633
RE: What do the Kiwi's have to say now?? Adam Thompson
November 14, 2012, 11:04:45

Thomspson getting a snotklap from a scrummie and then trying to make a come back shielded by other players in the way. Hahahhahahahahahaha - not very impressive hawka lets be honest!

Kockott was an outstanding player ruined by the Sharks. Wish he had come down to WP. He is of international class.

As for craig joubert he is a bulle ref deep in the nz pocket.  I recall how he robbed us of a Super 15 cup at loftus blowing our brilliant loose trio of Schalk, Louw and Vermuelen out of the game while, as Schalk said, coaching the bulle loosies who were taking a battering! Neve rever seen the phlematic Burger so chipped off. Then we had the WC final debacle. The guy of course can ref.


Ceradyne

Status: Senior player
Posts: 3054
RE: What do the Kiwi's have to say now?? Adam Thompson
November 14, 2012, 12:06:11

Still battling to come to grips with the resounding hammering you took in 2010 in SOWETO, not Loftus, are you? LOL

 


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11633
RE: What do the Kiwi's have to say now?? Adam Thompson
November 14, 2012, 12:58:45

Soweto/ loftus whats the diff. hahahahahahaha

windpomp please lets not hav ea whole lot of drivel regaring this stuff again.

By the way why dont you get your avatar up and running. You know the one with the pink rugby jeersey Bwahahahahahahaha.

Bye the way windpomp do you know ou dorkie dumbo made a few posts here? I gave him a few minor snotklaps and as Barlee and Hakwer were not here to protect the dear he ran off in a pool of tears. Hahahahhahahahaha a short (thankfully) but brief stay  - lasted an day or two! Styked himself the real dork!  

Barlee got himself into a complete froth about a few comments I made here and threatened to report me to my boss for accessing HIS website during office hours. I told him to please go ahead. I am actually, in any event  leaving my place of employment at the end of December and going contracting. What a load of garbage given all they have said about us!!!  Ask him to please grow up will ya windpomp he may listen to you? Really cant understand this vindictiveness at all. I am far more sinned against than sinning! Poor old Beeno! Hahahahhahaha

 


Ceradyne

Status: Senior player
Posts: 3054
RE: What do the Kiwi's have to say now?? Adam Thompson
November 14, 2012, 16:06:40

I have told you many times to do your dirty work yourself. Your so-called "victories" over others are of no concern of mine either. I will change my avatar as and when I like. I was let to believe that this is a forum of lots of freedom, but I have seen people being told, by the forum-sherriff, to piss off and now you are trying te get my to put on an avatar. Jou mielie man.


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11633
RE: What do the Kiwi's have to say now?? Adam Thompson
November 15, 2012, 08:43:14

What dirty work telling your mate Barlee to grow up is an act of kindness. Threats like he made are symtomatic of big problems so go and give him a hand and who knows he may become a better man for it!

Those guys who were given the boot here were way over the top. We have an excellent decent mod who has that gift called objectivity and is mature enough not to over react  - what a contrast!!

Now as to your avatar all I am suggesting is for you to put up your favourite avatar - the pink jersey . Feel free to come out of the closet - hahahahahahahahaha.

Man you are such a serious oak! Lighten up!

 


Leave a reply:

You need to be logged in to leave a reply.
 
 

From The Sideline