The Ruckers Forum

Forum » Rugby » Super Rugby » Sharks by 12...
Login to reply
 
 
 
1693 Topic: Sharks by 12...
Denny

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1730
Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 09:14:51

Best loose trio in world rugby should be enough to win this one once they slip into gear. Go you good things!


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11707
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 11:21:03

Hopefully a sharks win for sure. Best lose trio in world rugby - you have to be joking.


redsman

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 934
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 11:35:10

Reds by 7............... you heard it here first......................

Bring it!


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11707
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 11:57:08

Get a grip redsman the shartks re munching you!


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11707
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 12:10:13

How it going redsman. Hope you last the distance!

Reds get a penalty and convert 17-3


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11707
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 12:14:00

Great drop Freddie. Another try please sharkies lets put the Reds away before half time! Hahahahahaha 


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11707
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 12:21:01

Try by reds. Dont lose concentration sharkies. Focus boys focus.


redsman

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 934
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 12:26:09

good start by sharks but reds gonna come back strong - gonna go down to the wire.

too many stupid mistakes and drop ball by reds.,

Kaplan assisting the shawwks and pieterson's eye gouge on higgers gotta be cited.....

no 10 jersey cursed this year for reds............ about the 5th injury to 10 - could do with QC..............................................


redsman

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 934
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 12:37:21

game set............. gonna be tough now.


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11707
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 12:38:30

Try sharks. will be 27-10. Keep yor focus sharkies the reds are there for the taking.

No whingeing abot the ref please redsman. Kaplan having a very sound game.


redsman

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 934
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 12:40:07

deliberate knockc on.... no penalty....


redsman

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 934
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 12:40:09

deliberate knockc on.... no penalty....


redsman

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 934
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 12:41:41

sharks not realsing after tackle - scrum sharks feed..... joke


redsman

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 934
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 12:42:49

in from the side reds scrum no penalty - kaplan is a cheat


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11707
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 12:44:32

Sharkies missed an intercept.

Big Bottom needs a snotklap. He has been at Bressler the whole game .Complete twit.


redsman

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 934
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 12:45:33

held up BEFORE the line.... scurm reds - KAPLAN is  a cheat


redsman

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 934
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 12:47:02

quick play of the ball called back - kaplan cheats again


redsman

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 934
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 12:48:20

as soon as momentum starts he slows the game down 'heve a werd to you players...' kaplan is a cheat


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11707
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 12:49:51

Great defence sharkies . what a bad pass by Mac!


redsman

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 934
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 12:53:28

absolute BS - no try what a crock this game is rigged - all the time the sharks get a breather...............absolute BS


redsman

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 934
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 12:56:12

another quick tap called back - cheat load of crap Kaplan is winnign this for sharks as predicted


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11707
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 12:56:15

Life is tough  when you have an honest ref and a honest tmo - what a surprise to find that!


redsman

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 934
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 12:57:35

think what u like this is rigged - kaplan had ruined this gaem


redsman

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 934
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 12:59:55

now not in red zone kaplan will be preceiveably fair - what a disgrace..................................

all midfield defnce offside...nothing


hakwa

Status: Senior player
Posts: 2399
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 13:34:36

 come on redsman, give Credit where it is due - the Reds pressed the SELF DESTRUCT button and the Sharks played very very well! Kaplan certainly did not score an intercept killer try under the posts.


mozart

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8382
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 13:56:00

Good call Denny


green

Status: Baby Bok
Posts: 179
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 14:08:31

Oi, Redneck, I guess you going to credit Kaplan for this Sharks victory, eh???? Your one-eyed support and poor sportmanship was quite evident mate and I think that justice has been very well served today because we have a Kiwi- Saffa final loooming and so it should be....no wannabee pretenders here mate!!!!


DbDraad

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1047
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 15:26:05

Kaplan was'nt that good, but the Sharks played the best rugga of the w/e and deserved to win.


Majestic

Status: Orange peeler
Posts: 28
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 15:36:50

Redsman you fool! Sharks brilliant defence won the game, not Kaplan.


Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11707
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 15:45:46

Redsman supports his team. Always next year Redsman.

 


clevermike

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 12596
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 17:16:38

Redsman

Don't blame Kaplan for the defeat - the better team won today.   Kaplan awarded a lot of penalties to the Reds for trsnsgressions and less to the Sharks.   However, I said in advance that the Reds do not have the fire power to beat the Sharks - and that is the end of the story.   The Reds were beaten both on attak and defence - they had no chance of winning - so that is the end of the story..

You must also write to your nu,mber 8 to play rugby - this nis not a boxing rink

I know that you are disappointed - but please be reasonable and look at the game objectively.

 


Brycy

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1285
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 21, 2012, 18:48:48

Kaplan competing with Brycy for notoriety Red. Pretty smooth operator giving his Durban team the win. So much for impartiality having a yarpie ref reffing his homeside my friend but don't mention cheating cause Bean Brain and not so Clever Mike will say bad sportsmanship even though other teams cheating is all they talk about . Funny as these yarpies


Boklogic

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1950
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 22, 2012, 02:19:08

Brycy, you ignorant [removed]. Here is a meaning of the word "Japie" that you love to throw around but cant spell properly:

This term is often used as a derogatory term for Caucasian South Africans by the British or people of former British Colonies such as Australia and New Zealand. It appears to have been derived from the [removed] term "plaasjapie" meaning a farm-boy, and implies someone who is ignorant and uneducated, aimed mainly at the Afrikaner (of [removed] origin)

So what if we are English speaking, educated and never been near a farm before? The reason so many South African's are in NZL is because you fools are dumb and we take all your jobs so you are forced to smoke P and jump in the dole queue. Lazy people. I know this because I am a South African taking your money! You cant argue with that statement because you are a great ambasador for your country in proving the brain talent is not high...
 


clevermike

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 12596
RE: Sharks by 12...
July 22, 2012, 07:50:11

Redsman

I looked at the game again to see where your attacks on Kaplan came in.   You are missing the role of the two line judges completely.   They are also on the look out for off side play and will warn the referee that they think the players were off side.   The alleged off-side of the backline referred I believe to the intercept try - they definitely came up flat in defence - nobody was off-side in that case - and the pass was looking for intercept.   

 The one incident you mention about the scrum was when the Reds were held up and the ball never got out of the maul - because it never reached the ground.   That according to the laws mean a scrum is awarded to the opposition - it happened twice to the Sharks as well and the Reds got scrums awarded to them.

The penalty call back was because it was taken at leat four meters from where the penalty was awarded.   No referee would allow that.   In any event even if Kaplan allowed it - it lead to nowhere fast.   That so-called try in about the 60th minute was not awarded because neither Kaplan nor the line judges nor the TV ref could see whether the try was scored.   Kaplan asked for input and that lead to the decision of a five yard scrum in favour of the Reds.

There was one incident where the ball was kicked into the Reds 22 and there was a blatant forward pass from the one Reds player to another - the commentators call it forward - but Kaplan was too far back and so was the line judges - so play was allowed to contnue.   On HD television it looked forward as well.   Missed that one - Redsman?   

It is no use to blame referees for the loss of a game - when in fact the score was completely one-sided like 20-3 at one stage of the game.   What was evident was that there was less attack of the Sharks in the seond half than in the first.   That could be as a result of impact of jet lag or the fact that the Sharks felt they were far enough ahead and that continued prressure on attack was not required at high intensity level.   However, they defended theeir line very well under extreme Reds pressure and the fact that the Reds scored a try on the 80th minute can be attributed to that scenario as well.   

The Reds were very lucky in respect of one attack when Du Plessis paased the ball to Bosman and with an open line in front Bosman fouled up badly and dived short of the line.   If it was Jordaan (he was replaced by then) it would have been another try for the Sharks.

If the Reds felt that Kaplan caused a loss to the Reds - they could have reported Kaplan and he would be dealt with by the panel - but I would lay a bet that such a report was never made.   So stop your maoning and get real - the Reds lost the game because on both attack and defence they were ebaten by a better team - end of story.   

    


Leave a reply:

You need to be logged in to leave a reply.
 
 

From The Sideline